JSC to answer for alleged unconstitutional practices

Cape Town - The body tasked with appointing South Africa’s judges is divided on how to make the judiciary representative of South African society.

Last week, Judicial Services Commissioner Izak Smuts appointed to represent advocates, resigned. He had written a report giving his views on the issue of transformation.

Smuts says it is clear that concerns over whether the JSC is overlooking white male applicants for positions are being ignored.

Legal advocacy group Freedom Under Law says it’s now considering challenging the way judges are appointed. One of their directors Advocate Jeremy Gauntlett is one of the candidates who has been turned down for a judicial position.

The group alleges that the JSC is too easy on some applicants during interviews, while being unfairly harsh to others.

Legal analysts say it is clear the judiciary is split over the issue of transformation and that a programme is needed to clearly outline the criteria for appointing judges to the judiciary.

 

COLUMN: Journalist Dianne Hawker asks whether the transformation debate should involve us, the public. 

- eNCA

COMMENTS Discussion Policy

SECTIONS Top Stories South Africa Africa World Money Sport Life Technology Opinion
SHOWS Africa 360 Against All Odds CheckPoint Chester Missing Earth Watch eNCA Afrikaans eNCA isiZulu eShibobo Judge For Yourself Late Nite News Maggs on Media Moneyline Screen Time Tech Report The Big Debate The Close Up The Justice Factor Winners and Losers
ABOUT About Contact Work with us News Team Privacy Policy Press Releases Licensing Discussions Policy Advertise on eNCA.com
WATCH US ON Livestation DSTV 403 e.tv africa Sky eNews Prime Time eNuus Kyknet
FOLLOW US ON Youtube