Fossil research raises questions of human origins

Technology
Professor Francis Thackeray, director of the Institute for Human Evolution at the University of the Witwatersrand, says that new research published on Australopithecus sediba raises questions about where the species fits into the hominid family tree. eNCA
The reconstructed skull and mandible of Australopithecus sediba. Reconstruction by Peter Schmid, photo by Lee Berger courtesy of the University of the Witwatersrand Picture: Reconstruction by Peter Schmid, photo by Lee Berger courtesy of the University of the Witwatersrand
2D reconstruction of the 2-million-year-old Australopithecus sediba based on fossils from the MH1, MH12 and MH4 skeletons from Malapa, South Africa. Reconstruction by Peter Schmid, photo by Lee Berger, courtesy University of the Witwatersrand Picture: Reconstruction by Peter Schmid, photo by Lee Berger, courtesy University of the Witwatersrand
Casting technicians at the Evolutionary Studies Institute, University of the Witwatersrand cast elements of the sediba skeleton in order to prepare the standing reconstruction. Photo by Bonita de Klerk, courtesy of the University of the Witwatersrand Picture: Bonita de Klerk, courtesy of the University of the Witwatersrand

Johannesburg –  “Is it a tree? Is it a bush? Or is it a thicket?” Professor Francis Thackeray raised these questions on the form of humankind’s evolution when discussing new research about the hominid species' two-million-year-old Australopithecus sediba published in the journal Science.

Thackeray, director of the Institute for Human Evolution at the University of the Witwatersrand, says that while the discovery of Au. sediba provided almost two complete skeletons that researchers have been able to look at in more detail, it does raise questions about where the species fits into the hominid family tree.

“We recognise sediba as a valid species but how it relates to other taxonomoy is another question all together.”

He adds that in the past, when there were fewer specimens it was easier to separate the different species but now with an increase in fossil specimens the boundaries are disappearing.

“As the sample sizes increase, you find that boundaries between the taxonomy break down.”

Thackeray’s comments follow the new research, which shows that this possible human ancestor climbed trees but was not able to run fast.

A team of South African and international scientists from the Evolutionary Studies Institute at Wits and 15 other global institutions, contributed to the papers.

The six papers represent the culmination of more than four years of research into the anatomy of Au. sediba based on the holotype and paratype skeletons commonly referred to as MH1 and MH2, as well as the adult isolated tibia referred to as MH4. The fossil remains were discovered at the site of Malapa in August of 2008, and Professor Lee Berger and his colleagues named the species in 2010.

-eNCA

COMMENTS

     

LATEST STORIES

Inkatha Freedom Party councillor Neliswa Nzuza was stabbed to death in full view of congregants attending a church service on Friday.
An Egyptian court on Sunday sentenced 30 people to more than three years in prison for violent protests in support of deposed Islamist president Mohamed Morsi.
Gunmen in northern Nigeria set fire to a staff residential building at a girls' secondary school on Sunday but the 195 students sleeping in their nearby dormitories were unharmed.

TOP STORIES view all

At least thirteen Nepalese mountain guides died in the avalanche on Mount Everest.
Sunday marks 50 years since Nelson Mandela delivered his Rivonia Trial speech.
Archbishop Emeritus Desmond Tutu and other religious leaders led a protest to parliament on Saturday to speak out against poor leadership.

NEWS STREAMcloseview all

This is the overlay

eNCA Subscriptions

Close