MPs blast SABC executives over Hlaudi


Former SABC COO Hlaudi Motsoeneng during the SABC 2015/2016 financial report release on September 29, 2016 in Johannesburg.

PARLIAMENT – MPs on Tuesday blasted the SABC for its “reckless” decision to apply for leave to appeal a Western Cape High Court ruling that Hlaudi Motsoeneng not be allowed to hold any position at the public broadcaster, suggesting that executives should foot the legal bill in their personal capacity.

“It is time that public entities, either Parliament takes a decision or we enact law…[that] when people take reckless decisions…that those people should actually pay out of their own pockets,” ANC MP Jabu Mahlangu said as Parliament’s ad hoc committee probing the affairs of the broadcaster met for the first time since releasing its draft report in January.

“We cannot allow a situation where public funds are just used by people employed by the state recklessly.”

WATCH: #SABCInquiry committee receives submissions

Mahlangu inferred that since there was no SABC board in place, the decision to apply for leave to appeal could not have been approved.

IFP MP Narend Singh said a clear message should be sent to executives not to “treat this committee with contempt”, while the EFFs’ Fana Mokoena said Communications Minister Faith Muthambi should be asked to explain the actions of the executives.

“What we should then do is recommend to the minister…to ask Mr [James] Aguma [acting CEO] and in particular Mr [Kaizer] Kganyago [SABC spokesman] that they should explain themselves why when there is an inquiry in process, why do they go and make such terrible decisions on behalf of the SABC? Are they doing it with her permission, if not they must explain both to her [Muthambi] and to Parliament so we have an understanding of what we dealing with,” Mokoena suggested.

Patrick Chauke, ANC MP, stressed the importance of raising these concerns with the portfolio committee on communications, as some disturbing matters had come to the committee’s attention.

“There are issues of contracts happening fraudulently in SABC,” said Chauke, citing reports that various multi-million rand contracts had been pushed through by executives during the festive season, ahead of the committee’s draft findings.

READ: SABC's appeal on Motsoeneng appointment dismissed

Committee chairman Vincent Smith said he would write to his counterpart on the portfolio committee on communications to raise MPs’ concerns.

Meanwhile, MPs have agreed to postpone deliberations on responses it received from interested parties to its draft report. It emerged that only three submissions were received ahead of the February 16 deadline.

The draft report was sent to, among others, the SABC and Muthambi to respond before MPs finalised its report with recommendations.

The draft, released last month, crucifies Muthambi, suggesting she may have violated the law by overstepping her mandate and unduly interfering in the affairs of the SABC.


In the report, MPs also expressed concern about the minister’s role in the removal of board members “either through dismissal or resignation”, adding that she may have “covertly or overtly” pressured members of the board to appoint Hlaudi Motsoeneng, the controversial SABC executive without a matric certificate which several courts and the former public protector have found unfit to hold office at the broadcaster, as chief operating officer at a board meeting in July 2014.

READ: MPs adopt SABC Inquiry draft report

MPs contend the former SABC board failed to act to prevent irregular expenditure, which according to the report accumulated to R5.1 billion rand over the past few years.

The bleeding of money was continuing, with the parliamentary committee noting a “looming financial crisis” at the SABC.

Last year, the Western Cape High Court ruled Motsoeneng could not hold any position at the broadcaster, either pending the findings of a new disciplinary hearing or a review application being sought against the public protector’s findings on Motsoeneng.

Earlier this month, the SABC in a widely condemned move applied for leave to appeal, but the court dismissed the application.


Paid Content