Trump fined $355m, banned from NY business in fraud trial

NEW YORK - A New York judge ordered Donald Trump to pay $355-million over fraud allegations and banned him from running companies in the state for three years in a major blow to his business empire and financial standing.

Trump was found liable for unlawfully inflating his wealth and manipulating the value of properties to obtain favorable bank loans or insurance terms.

Trump accused President Joe Biden of driving the case, calling it "weaponization against a political opponent who's up a lot in the polls", and vowed to appeal.

As the case was civil, not criminal, there was no threat of imprisonment. But Trump said ahead of the ruling that a ban on conducting business in New York state would be akin to a "corporate death penalty." 

Trump, facing 91 criminal counts in other cases, has seized on his legal woes to fire up supporters and denounce his likely opponent Biden, claiming that court cases are "just a way of hurting me in the election."

However, Judge Arthur Engoron said the financially shattering penalties are justified by Trump's behaviour.

"Their complete lack of contrition and remorse borders on pathological," Engoron said of Trump and his two sons, who were also defendants, in his scathing ruling.

"They are accused only of inflating asset values to make more money... Donald Trump is not Bernard Madoff. Yet, defendants are incapable of admitting the error of their ways," he added, referring to the perpetrator of a massive Ponzi scheme.

Trump's sons Eric and Donald Trump Jr. were also found liable in the case and ordered to pay more than $4-million each, prompting Don Jr. to claim on social media that "political beliefs" had determined the outcome.

The Trump Organization, an avowedly family business, will also be forced by the ruling to allow in an independent compliance director answerable to the court.

The judge's order was a victory for New York state Attorney General Letitia James. She had sought $370-million from Trump to remedy the advantage he is alleged to have wrongfully obtained, as well as having him barred from conducting business in the state.