A Close Election Is Not the Same as a Stable Government
The first eNCA/MarkData metro polling figures point to closely contested municipalities. But the bigger test of local democracy may begin after the ballots are counted.
An election can produce a clear set of numbers without producing a clear government. South Africa's metropolitan municipalities have become increasingly familiar with that distinction. When support is distributed among several parties, winning the largest share of votes does not necessarily provide the authority or parliamentary arithmetic needed to govern. For residents waiting for reliable services, the difference between electoral competition and administrative stability can be profound.
The eNCA/MarkData 2026 local government survey offers a useful illustration. In Ekurhuleni, the DA measured 31.2% support against the ANC's 29.4%, with the MK Party on 11.5% and the EFF on 9.2%. ActionSA and the Freedom Front Plus also recorded notable shares. In Nelson Mandela Bay, the DA measured 37.7% and the ANC 37.4%, a difference of just 0.3 percentage points. These figures describe voter intentions at the time of fieldwork, not election results, and the small differences between the two largest parties should not be mistaken for statistically decisive leads.
Yet the distribution of support points towards a governance problem that extends beyond the contest between the DA and ANC. In Ekurhuleni, even the largest party's measured share is far below an outright majority. Any future council without a majority party would need some form of agreement across political lines to elect office-bearers, pass budgets and sustain the decisions on which municipal services depend. The central question is not merely who might cooperate, but what that cooperation would be designed to achieve.
That distinction matters because coalitions can be assembled for different purposes. An agreement may focus primarily on distributing political positions, or it may establish shared priorities, measurable service commitments and procedures for resolving disputes. Both can produce a governing arrangement on paper. Only the latter provides residents with a meaningful framework for judging whether the arrangement is delivering on its promises. The durability of a coalition is not simply a question of how long its members remain together, but whether the municipality can continue making and implementing decisions.
Voter dissatisfaction makes the challenge more urgent. According to the survey, 58.7% of Ekurhuleni respondents and 65.4% of Nelson Mandela Bay respondents
described their municipalities as badly run when the two negative response categories are combined. These are perceptions rather than independent performance audits, but they reveal a substantial deficit of public confidence. They also complicate the assumption that dissatisfaction automatically translates into a mandate for one alternative party. Voters may distribute their support across several competitors, retain longstanding party loyalties or choose not to participate.
Turnout adds another layer of uncertainty. The supplied survey material records turnout of 43% in Ekurhuleni and 46% in Nelson Mandela Bay in the 2021 local government elections. A larger voters' roll does not guarantee a larger voting public, and the preferences of those who say they intend to vote may differ from the choices of those who ultimately arrive at polling stations. Ward contests and proportional representation further complicate any attempt to translate a single survey percentage into a council majority.
The implications stretch well beyond election night. Municipal councils must approve budgets, exercise oversight and maintain the political conditions in which officials can deliver services. When governing agreements repeatedly become unstable, residents may struggle to identify who is responsible for decisions and whether promises made during negotiations have been honoured. Accountability becomes harder when political responsibility is continuously rearranged.
The next test for South Africa's metropolitan politics is therefore more demanding than producing a first-place party. It is whether parties can explain, before entering government, how they intend to work together, which commitments will survive disagreements and how residents will be able to measure progress. A close election may demonstrate that voters have choices. A functioning municipality must demonstrate that those choices can still produce government.
References
· eNCA/MarkData 2026 Local Government Election Survey: Ekurhuleni and Nelson Mandela Bay polling graphics supplied for the programme.
· SA Explained, 13 October 2026: Naledi Moleo in conversation with Wayne Sussman.
· eNCA, MarkData survey methodology.
· eNCA, Ekurhuleni survey findings.
· eNCA, Nelson Mandela Bay survey findings.
Catch up on all SA Explained episodes here: https://www.enca.com/sa-explained-podcast